Reviews by:
@augustkellerwrites
RATE THIS MOVIE
6
5
4
3
2012 is proof that bigger isn't better. Its scope is massive, but 2012 lacks fundamental heart. Ironically, the movie's about global extinction, yet fails to establish a human connection. The tedious first act sets up numerous characters, but they're all rushed, generic, and insincere. Once the numbing action begins, protagonists are often in danger and audiences are meant to feel suspense. However, the repetitiveness is desensitizing, the transparent character arcs are predictable, and emotional investment is nonexistent. Furthermore, the acting is inconsistent because the children are substandard and the adults are either unskilled or disinterested.
Meanwhile, 2012's technicals are sloppy. Sound is complex, CGI is heavy, and action is coherently shot, but these are minimum requirements. The editing balances the excessive plotlines, but is bloated with prolonged action and pointless scenes. The production design is unimaginative, cheap, and illogical. Finally, the direction is tone-deaf and in poor taste. Corny humor clashes with forced overdramatics, resulting in emotional whiplash. Plus, there are no respectful looks at the ramifications of the destruction. Melodramatic scenes show characters dying, but the movie moves along without lasting impact. Ultimately, 2012 is an insulting feast of noise and chaos.
Writing: 2/10
Direction: 3/10
Cinematography: 6/10
Acting: 4/10
Editing: 5/10
Sound: 7/10
Score/Soundtrack: 5/10
Production Design: 3/10
Casting: 5/10
Effects: 7/10
Overall Score: 4.7/10
For more of my work: https://guskeller.wixsite.com/moviefilmreviews
RATE THIS REVIEW
6
5
4
3
Comments